AI Engineering

AI Agents & Automation

We help teams automate multi-step work that consumes time and attention. Our engineers define tool access, checkpoints and escalation paths so agents can assist without hiding decisions or exceptions.

Conceptual engineering illustration for AI Agents & AutomationTranz / Engineering in practice
What we can help with

AI that fits the work your team needs to do

An AI feature needs a useful task, dependable information and a clear way to handle uncertain results. We start with the workflow and define what the model can decide, what a person must review and how quality will be checked.

01

Workflow and tool design

Define the steps an agent can take and the APIs it may use, with clear limits on each action.

What you receive

Workflow map, tool contracts and permission boundaries.

02

Approvals and exception handling

Add checkpoints before consequential actions and route ambiguous or failed tasks to the right person.

What you receive

Approval states, escalation rules and recovery paths.

03

Execution visibility

Make agent activity traceable so teams can review completed steps, errors and pending actions.

What you receive

Execution logs, monitoring plan and scenario tests.

Where it helps

Start with a real task, then shape the solution

These are examples of workflows we can scope with your team.

01

Knowledge assistants

Help teams find answers in approved policies, product material and internal documentation, with references they can check.

02

Document workflows

Extract and organise information from incoming documents, then route incomplete or uncertain records for review.

03

Assisted operations

Draft responses, summarise records and prepare the next action inside an existing business workflow.

A concrete scope

Know what the engagement will produce

We agree on the deliverables for your project before delivery begins.

A defined scope

Prioritised workflows, dependencies, responsibilities and acceptance criteria for the agreed release.

Reviewable work

Workflow map, tool contracts and permission boundaries; Approval states, escalation rules and recovery paths; Execution logs, monitoring plan and scenario tests.

A practical handover

The documentation, configuration, operating guidance and team walkthroughs included in your delivery plan.

Frameworks & tools

A toolkit shaped around your requirements

These are technology options for the engagement. We choose the stack around your existing systems, deployment needs and team; each project uses a relevant subset.

AI development languages

PythonJava

Model ecosystem

Hugging Face

Agent frameworks

LangChainLangGraphSpring AI

Vector search for agent knowledge

QdrantPostgreSQL + pgvector

AI tracing & evaluation

LangSmith

Workflow automation

n8n
Explore our technology expertise ↗
LLM models

Match the model to the task

We evaluate model families with representative examples from your product. The selected model and version depend on answer quality, tool use, response time, cost and deployment requirements.

OpenAI

GPT

GPT model family

Evaluate GPT models for product assistants, structured responses and workflows that call application tools.

Explore GPT models
Anthropic

Claude

Opus · Sonnet · Haiku

Compare Claude options for document analysis, conversational assistance and multi-step tool workflows.

Explore Claude models
Google

Gemini

Pro · Flash · Flash-Lite

Evaluate Gemini models for text and multimodal experiences, matching response quality and latency to the task.

Explore Gemini models
Mistral AI

Mistral

Large · Small · Codestral

Compare Mistral models for language and coding workflows, with hosted or deployable options where the chosen model supports them.

Explore Mistral models
Meta

Llama

Llama model family

Assess Llama models when deployment control matters, including hosting capacity, model licensing and operational ownership.

Explore Llama models
Alibaba / Qwen

Qwen

Qwen model family

Evaluate Qwen options for language, coding and multimodal tasks against your data, deployment needs and acceptance criteria.

Explore Qwen models
DeepSeek

DeepSeek

DeepSeek model family

Assess DeepSeek models for reasoning and application assistance, testing reliability, tool behaviour and operating cost on your workflow.

Explore DeepSeek models

Model selection is part of the engineering work

We test the proposed model with your prompts, retrieved context and application tools, then agree on the version, review points and fallback behaviour. For RAG, we also evaluate retrieval and embedding choices; for agents, we test action boundaries and recovery when a tool fails.

How we work

Move from a clear brief to a useful release

01

Define the task

Choose a workflow, representative inputs and the decisions that require human approval.

02

Prepare the data

Review source quality, permissions, retrieval rules and connections to existing systems.

03

Evaluate a pilot

Compare outputs against agreed examples; test missing evidence, incorrect answers and tool failures.

04

Release and monitor

Introduce the feature to a defined user group and track quality, latency, usage and operating cost.

Before we begin

Questions about the engagement

How do you check whether the AI is useful?

We agree on representative examples and acceptance criteria before the pilot. Reviews cover answer quality, evidence, failure handling and the effort required from users.

Can AI use private business information?

We first review who can access each source, what information can leave your systems and the deployment requirements. Those decisions shape model access, retrieval and logging.

Will people still review the results?

Review points depend on the action. Drafting an internal summary and changing an operational record require different controls; we define those boundaries in the workflow.

Discuss ai agents & automation

Tell us what needs to work better.

Share your current workflow, existing systems and the result you want. We’ll help define a practical next step.

Discuss your project ↗